Skip to content

EFFICIENCY VS. SENSITIVITY

WHAT ABOUT DIRECTIVITY VS DISPERSION?

Fred, the sound man, in spite of being as strong as an ox, and an expert driver, (he once came in second at the Marty Robbins Steer Wrestling and Go-Kart Grand Prix in El Paso) develops the annoying habit of turning everything you say into a discussion of sound reinforcement. Seeing as how the two of you are cooped up in Fred’s 2002 Econoline van for the long drives between one-nighters, your nerves are beginning to fray.

Along about 3 o’clock one morning on the outskirts of Buckatunna, you say, ā€œI’m starving. Let’s whip into a burger joint and snag a sack of sliders.ā€

Fred replies, ā€œThat reminds me of how some speakers consume a lot of power. Did you know…ā€

ā€œShut up!ā€ you shout. Fred’s a great guy, but enough is enough. ā€œCan’t you talk about anything besides sound?ā€

Fred, looking wounded, mumbles, ā€œYou don’t have to be so sensitive.ā€ After a few seconds of sullen silence, he says, ā€œAnd speaking of sensitive, did I tell you about the difference between speakerĀ efficiencyĀ vsĀ sensitivity? Let’s begin by covering a few of the basics. SpeakerĀ EfficiencyĀ vsĀ sensitivityĀ are related but separate properties. The fact that both are stated inĀ dBĀ often adds to the confusion.ā€

Realizing the futility of your cause, you try not to think about food as Fred rambles through town without realizing he’s passed the one and only all night eatery talking about speaker efficiency vs sensitivity.

ā€œThink of a speaker as pivoting from side to side on its vertical axis and tilting up and down on itsĀ horizontalĀ axis. The spot directly in front of the speaker (on-axisĀ or atĀ 0 [zero] degrees) serves as the point of reference in discussions ofĀ coverage anglesĀ and/orĀ sensitivity.ā€ He continues, ā€œA speaker’sĀ angle ofĀ dispersionĀ is measured in comparison to both its horizontal and vertical axes.Ā Coverage angleĀ describes the area blanketed by the sound pressure waves produced by a speaker. The edges, or limits, of the area are defined by a 6 dB drop-off in sound pressure from onĀ axis.

ā€œQĀ (theĀ directivityĀ factor) is a ratio obtained by complex mathematical calculations involving the relationship of a speaker’sĀ direct radiated energyĀ to itsĀ total radiated energy. When measuredĀ on axis, QĀ (which is dependent on frequency) is used to determine a speaker’s suitability for a particular application.

ā€œSensitivityĀ is the level of sound pressure directly in front of the speaker (on axis), at a given amount of power, at a given distance (Example:Ā 100 dB @ 1 watt @ 1 meter). Most speaker specifications pertain toĀ sensitivity.

ā€œEfficiencyĀ is the percentage of acoustic energy radiated in all directions from a speaker, compared to the input of a given amount of power (3% to 4% efficiency is typical for a woofer). Given two speakers with identicalĀ sensitivityĀ and the input of an identical amount of power, the speaker with widerĀ dispersionĀ is moreĀ efficient.ā€ Fred pauses long enough to ask, ā€œAre you with me so far?ā€

Fred, however exasperating, knows his business. And since the growling of your stomach is keeping you awake anyway, you ask, ā€œWhat about the relationship between amplifier power, sound pressure levels, and actual loudness? Will a 200 watt amp produce twice the SPL of a 100 watt amp?ā€

Cheered by his newly attentive audience, Fred explains, ā€œTo achieve a 3 dB increase in sound pressure requires twice the amount of power from the amplifier. So if one speaker is 3 dB more sensitive than another, the less sensitive speaker will require twice as much power to achieve the same sound pressure level (on axis) as its more sensitive counterpart. An increase of 6 dB is equal to twice theĀ sound pressure. An increase of 10 dB produces twice theĀ perceived loudness.ā€

ā€œSo,ā€ you observe, ā€œdoubling the size of my system will increase the loudness by only 3 dB.ā€

ā€œThat’s exactly right.ā€ Fred says, ā€œSound can be divided into two types of speakers:Ā direct soundĀ speakers, in which sound emanates from the cone or horn, andĀ reverberated sound,Ā which is reflected off of the walls and other surfaces within a room. As you move further away from the speaker,Ā direct soundĀ grows fainter. The point at which the SPL of reverberated— orĀ reverberant— sound is equal to that of direct sound is called theĀ critical distance. Coverage angle differences and other factors mean horns and cones can have different critical distances.Ā  Beyond theĀ critical distanceĀ is an area known as theĀ reverberant fieldĀ in which there is no further decline in sound pressure levels. In the reverberant field, the SPL is influenced more by the speaker’sĀ efficiencyĀ than itsĀ sensitivity.

ā€œYou’re in a reverberant room; let’s make it a hockey arena. Near the speakers, the sound is good, but as you move farther away, it’s bassy. The horns are moreĀ sensitiveĀ than the woofers. The woofers are moreĀ efficientĀ than the horns. To achieve aĀ flatĀ frequency responseĀ (in which the bass, mids and highs are at the same volume) the horns have beenĀ shelvedĀ at theĀ crossover, meaning the signal going to the horns has been adjusted to compensate for the difference between their sensitivity and that of the woofers. TheĀ on-axisĀ SPL of the horns and woofers isĀ equal. The woofers’ critical distance is 20 feet and the horns’ is 30 feet. Beyond 20 feet from the woofers (in theirĀ reverberant field) there is no further reduction in their SPL. At 20 feet from the horns, you’re still hearing direct sound which, as you move away, continues to decrease (according to theĀ inverse square law) until you reach their critical distance. To be heard as easily as the bass frequencies, the mids and highs require more and more power.

Fred continues, ā€œOutdoors, without the influence of walls, ceilings, and other surfaces, there is virtually no reverberant field, so SPL’s continue to drop as you move away from the source, until the sound disappears into the noise floor.ā€

You ask, ā€œShould the sound system be tailoredĀ with different types of speakers to suit the venue?ā€

Fred replies, ā€œYes. Take, for instance, choosing betweenĀ high QĀ speakers andĀ low QĀ speakers.Ā  Remember, your goal as a sound man (or sound woman) is to make sure everyone in the room, no matter where they’re sitting, can clearly hear and understand what is coming out of the speakers. You don’t want part of the audience hearing only direct sound and the others hearing only reverberant sound. The coverage throughout the room should be as uniform as possible using different types of speakers.ā€

Finding a half-eaten bag of barbecued pork rinds under your seat, you say, ā€œTell me more,ā€ and tuck hungrily into your snack.

Happy to oblige, Fred continues. ā€œIn a room with short reverb times (a small church, for example) aĀ low QĀ speaker, likeĀ Galaxy Audio’s CR12, works better. Its larger sonicĀ footprintĀ allows theĀ reverberant fieldĀ to cover the area not in theĀ direct field, so that a similar quality of sound is heard by the entire audience. In a room with long reverb times (a large church, for example), aĀ high QĀ speaker, like theĀ CR15, is better. Its tightĀ coverage angleĀ washes the audience in direct sound and reduces apparent reverb time.ā€

You ask, ā€œDoes anybody design and build speakers that are sensitiveĀ andĀ efficient?”

ā€œOf course,ā€ says Fred. ā€œthat’s what Galaxy Audio has been doing since 1977. Now can I have one of those pork rinds?ā€

Cart
Back To Top
4